Monday, July 7, 2014

Ammu's Death Strips Garment Industry Of Halo

Of Exports and Other Exits

 26/02/2007

 Anita Ratnam

 When 25-year-old Ammu hanged herself in the toilet of the garment factory where she worked on 10th February 2007, it evoked little attention from the media and even less from the apparel industry. One more suicide in a city known for its growing suicide rate is hardly newsworthy. Also, it can be conveniently blamed on an unstable personality or unhappy “personal” life. Yet the fact that Ammu was young, female, migrant, a single mother and desperately poor are not irrelevant factors in her becoming a garment factory worker. Indeed, each of these is what the garment industry looks for in getting a docile workforce where gender, youth-hood and poverty intersect to the advantage of the employer. While in most cases it spells indebtedness and drudgery, in Ammu’s case it culminated in a discursive drama that led her to death.

 With her passing, the questions surrounding her final act of despair, could easily fade away into oblivion. But for the 3 lakh women in and around Bangalore like Ammu, who continue to grapple with the very same issues on a daily basis, Ammu’s death is too close to the bone, too grim a reminder of what their tenuous lives are about. News has now spread that Ammu’s supervisor had pushed her and even thrown fabric at her.  Her colleagues have now narrated that when Ammu expressed inability to work at the speed demanded by her supervisor, the production manager refused to sign her exit pass and ordered Ammu to resume work. The suicide notes written on her palm and on the exit pass she was clutching, states that she was forced to take this extreme measure due to this harassment. Ironic, that the only “exit” she got was through death.

 What makes this suicide so bizarre is that it has taken place while Brand Bangalore is busy acquiring an image of Garment City. After much hype about IT Parks and Electronic Cities, citizens of Bangalore have been told that we have one more dollar earning industry to be proud of. The 900 odd ubiquitous garment factories have put namma Bengaluru on the global garment map, earning a whopping Rs 7000 crores last year. The apparel boom is expected to take off in the wake of lifting of sanctions on textile imports by US and European countries following the 2005 Agreement on Textile and Clothing (ATC). Apart from export, the domestic retail market for foreign branded garments is also taking off, leading to a 2010 target of Rs. 10000 crores by the Clothing Manufacturers Association here.  

 The Karnataka State is not a silent spectator while all this happens. It has announced the setting up of   6 Apparel Parks at Doddaballapur, Harohalli, Davengere and even as far away as Bidar and Bellary which are in various stages of completion. Six  large enclaves  of 200 to 500 acres are being developed by the State to facilitate the setting up of apparel  related production units- weaving, spinning, bleaching, dyeing, embroidery, fabric processing, printing, tailoring,  accessories like zips, buttons and labels or  software for quality control. All such units can now be housed inside the “park “and can easily supply each others requirements while sharing common infrastructure from roads to security to common effluent treatment plants.

 Inside the “parks,” within each factory, a carefully calculated use of imported machines and local labour in finely calibrated proportions, is designed to maximise returns for the investor. It is not difficult to figure out why for certain orders, specific machinery is switched off and manual processes done.  According to these mysterious formulae, each member of the human workforce, especially in the tailoring units, must keep pace with an assembly line that moves at dizzying speeds, remote controlled by export order deadlines and fashion trends in the “west.”  Forcing a less than adequate workforce number to work overtime with no extra pay and harassment of women workers by male supervisors have become entrenched as “unavoidable” ways of meeting deadlines. And using deadlines as an excuse, a culture of fear and powerlessness has been cultivated on the shop floor, to prevent workers from articulating even basic rights- be it wages, or time to have lunch or take leave.

Against this backdrop, we keep hearing announcements claiming that each   Apparel Park would house 100-200 units and employ 30,000 to 60,000 workers, of whom about 80% will be women. While the State is busy making things easy for the investors, the lack of adequate attention to workers issues is unacceptable. Somehow, with Ammu's death, and increasing visibility of the dehumanized workplace, any “euphoria” about these 3 lakh new jobs already stinks.

At the end of the day the complex set of practices and norms at the workplace is about money.  Where Ammu worked was one of the units of Gokaldas chain of companies. This is especially disturbing because the company is one of the chief promoters of the Apparel SEZ at Harohalli, already running several units around Bangalore, with an annual turnover of more than 1000 crores, a profit of 13%   and employing 52200 workers. If this is the institutionalised workplace culture in the larger business houses, one shudders to think of the smaller garment sweat shops and fly by night sub-contract operators.

 
Thankfully today there is an attempt to organise such workers, not taking the factory as a unit 
(where unionising would be impossible), but unionising for the industry as a whole and linking with garment unions world wide. The International Trade Union, ITGLWF has asked the company for an explanation regarding Ammu’s death and has asked the Indian Labour Ministry as well as the certification agency WRAP (Worldwide Responsible Apparel Production) to investigate of the prevailing labour conditions in the industry.  

 For those of us who watch from the sidelines, this seems the moment to salute the 3 lakh women garment workers of Bangalore. Applaud them, not just for enduring strife, but for the ways in which they are now coming together even as  they  survive  long working hours, domestic chores, an excruciating pace of work, abusive  supervisors, low wages  and in the meantime manage pregnancies, childbirth, child care  with almost no support from the employers.

 But then as garment “consumers,” our salutations to these exhausted women reduces to mere rhetoric, if we do not interrogate their multiple deprivations. More importantly, this is a time to re-examine our own work place practices and consumption patterns to question the hegemonies of class, age and gender that operate insidiously. Surely, all oppression needs dignified exits, other than death.

No comments: